ArticleMicromachines2025
An Assessment of Local Geometric Uncertainties in Polysilicon MEMS: A Genetic Algorithm and POD-Kriging Surrogate Modeling Approach.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
On the way toward MEMS miniaturization, the quantification of geometric uncertainties stands as a primary challenge. In this paper, an approach that combines genetic algorithms and proper orthogonal decomposition with kriging surrogate modeling was proposed to accurately predict over-etch measures through an on-chip test device. Despite being fabricated on a single wafer under nominally identical manufacturing conditions, MEMS can display different responses under the same actuation, due to a different characteristic geometry. It is shown that the uncertainties, given in terms of over-etch values, were not only different from die to die but also within the same die, depending on the local geometric features of the device. Therefore, the proposed method provided an alternative solution to estimate the uncertainties in MEMS devices, relying only on the capacitance-voltage response. A statistical analysis was carried out based on a batch of devices tested in the laboratory. These tests and the estimation procedure allowed us to quantify the mean values of the over-etch relative to the target as +12.2 % at comb fingers, +10.0 % at the supporting springs, and -4.8 % at stoppers, showing noteworthy variability induced by the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.