ArticleHealth services research2025
Interdisciplinary Team-Based Intervention to Reduce Acute Care Utilization Among Emergency Department Multi-Visit Patients.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiprofessional Interventions for Frailty in Patients with Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Interdisciplinary Team-Based Intervention to Reduce Acute Care Utilization Among Emergency Department Multi-Visit Patients.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the emergency department (ED) Multi-Visit Patient (MVP) Program, a novel team-based approach to supporting patients with frequent ED utilization. STUDY SETTING AND
designThe ED MVP Program identified patients with frequent ED visits, conducted comprehensive chart reviews, and implemented tailored care plans to address healthcare barriers and social determinants of health. A comparison group included eligible patients who did not receive the intervention as well as those not yet treated at a given month. We conducted a quasi-experimental study using difference-in-differences analysis with dynamic effects. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Acute care utilization (ED visits, observation stays, inpatient admissions) and 30-day readmission data were extracted from the electronic health record system across a multi-hospital not-for-profit healthcare system in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. PRINCIPAL
findingsCompared with controls, patients receiving ED MVP intervention had 1.94 fewer acute care hospital visits (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.54, -1.34) and 2.42 fewer days of acute care utilization (95% CI: -3.19, -1.64) in the following 12 months. There was also a small reduction in 30-day inpatient readmissions, averaging 0.08 fewer readmissions (95% CI: -0.16, -0.01).
conclusionsThis study provides strong evidence for the effectiveness of a tailored care intervention to reduce acute care utilization among patients with frequent ED utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.