Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047565›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

Enhanced Performance of Novel Amorphous Silicon Carbide Microelectrode Arrays in Rat Motor Cortex.

Pegah Haghighi, Eleanor N Jeakle, Brandon S Sturgill, Justin R Abbott, Elysandra Solis, Veda S Devata, Gayathri Vijayakumar, Ana G Hernandez-Reynoso, Stuart F Cogan, Joseph J Pancrazio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pegah HaghighiDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Eleanor N JeakleDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8714-3517
Brandon S SturgillDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8161-9723
Justin R AbbottDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Elysandra SolisDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Veda S DevataDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2054-5262
Gayathri VijayakumarSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Ana G Hernandez-ReynosoDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Stuart F CoganDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6316-3032
Joseph J PancrazioDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-3690

Funding

NIH HHS 2R01TW104344-22S5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable microelectrode arrays (MEAs) enable the recording of electrical activity from cortical neurons for applications that include brain-machine interfaces. However, MEAs show reduced recording capabilities under chronic implantation conditions. This has largely been attributed to the brain's foreign body response, which is marked by neuroinflammation and gliosis in the immediate vicinity of the MEA implantation site. This has prompted the development of novel MEAs with either coatings or architectures that aim to reduce the tissue response. The present study examines the comparative performance of multi-shank planar, silicon-based devices and low-flexural-rigidity amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC) MEAs that have a similar architecture but differ with respect to the shank cross-sectional area. Data from a-SiC arrays were previously reported in a prior study from our group. In a manner consistent with the prior work, larger cross-sectional area silicon-based arrays were implanted in the motor cortex of female Sprague-Dawley rats and weekly recordings were made for 16 weeks after implantation. Single unit metrics from the recordings were compared over the implantation period between the device types. Overall, the expression of single units measured from a-SiC devices was significantly higher than for silicon-based MEAs throughout the implantation period. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated reduced neuroinflammation and gliosis around the a-SiC MEAs compared to silicon-based devices. Our findings demonstrate that the a-SiC MEAs with a smaller shank cross-sectional area can record single unit activity with more stability and exhibit a reduced inflammatory response compared to the silicon-based device employed in this study.

Indexed as

brain–machine interfaceintracortical microelectrode arraysmicroelectrodeneural engineeringneural interface

Identifiers

PMID40047565
PMCPMC11857598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.