Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047422›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Deletion of

Alexandria M Layton, Christopher McCauley, Kevin E Redding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandria M LaytonSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-6641
Christopher McCauleyArizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Kevin E ReddingSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2819-4022

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 18-EXO18-0080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Heliobacteria are a unique group of phototrophic bacteria that are obligate anaerobes and possess a rudimentary system to use light as a source of energy. They do not make oxygen or fix carbon dioxide. Here, we explore their fundamental carbon metabolism to understand the role and operation of the central TCA cycle. This work shows both the role and operation of this cycle under different growth modes and explains how these organisms can obtain electrons to drive their biosynthetic metabolism. This foundational knowledge will be crucial in the future when attempts are made to use this organism as a platform for oxygen-sensitive synthesis of compounds in an anaerobe that can use light as its energy source.

Indexed as

BacillotaBacterial ProteinsCitrate (si)-SynthaseCitric Acid CycleEubacterialesGene DeletionPyruvic AcidBacterial ProteinsCitrate (si)-SynthasePyruvic Acidacetate metabolismcitrate synthaseelectron sourceheliobacteriaTCA cycle

Identifiers

PMID40047422
PMCPMC12016533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.