Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047385›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025

Development and Validation of a Disease-specific Outcomes Tool for the Assessment of Patient Benefits of Treatment for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: the PBI-HS.

Natalia Kirsten, Matthias Augustin, Christine Blome, Janine Topp, Richard Schwager, Falk G Bechara, Gefion Girbig, Andreas Pinter, Florian Anzengruber, Mareen Lindegaard and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalia KirstenInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany. nat.kirsten@gmx.de.
Matthias AugustinInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Christine BlomeInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Janine ToppInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Richard SchwagerInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Falk G BecharaDermatologic Surgery Unit, Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Gefion GirbigInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas PinterClinic for Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Florian AnzengruberDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mareen LindegaardInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Christos C ZouboulisDepartments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Dessau, Germany.
Marina OttenInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic skin disease associated with significant disease burden. To assess patients' treatment benefits, disease-specific outcomes measurement is needed. This study aimed to develop a questionnaire called Patient Benefit Index for hidradenitis suppurativa (PBI-HS). After an open-item survey, the items were condensed into a 26-item questionnaire on patient needs and benefits, with a 5-point Likert scale. In the validation study, construct and content validity, responsiveness, and feasibility of the questionnaire were assessed at 2 time points. A 26-item questionnaire was created following open-item generation by n = 72 patients. In the validation study, 3 items perceived as most relevant by patients were: "to be free of pain" (mean: 3.6 on a scale of 0-4), "to be free of inflammation" (mean: 3.6), "to have no more scars" (mean: 3.1). Significant correlations of PBI-HS at follow-up visit were found with the physical global assessment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS-PGA) (r = -0.471; p = 0.000), number of inflammatory lesions (r = -0.359; p = 0.005), and DLQI (r = -0.383; p = 0.003), indicating less disease burden in patients with higher treatment benefits. The PBI-HS is a feasible and valid instrument to assess patient-reported treatment benefits in hidradenitis suppurativa.

Indexed as

Hidradenitis SuppurativaPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40047385
PMCPMC11898107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.