ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025
Development and Validation of a Disease-specific Outcomes Tool for the Assessment of Patient Benefits of Treatment for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: the PBI-HS.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic skin disease associated with significant disease burden. To assess patients' treatment benefits, disease-specific outcomes measurement is needed. This study aimed to develop a questionnaire called Patient Benefit Index for hidradenitis suppurativa (PBI-HS). After an open-item survey, the items were condensed into a 26-item questionnaire on patient needs and benefits, with a 5-point Likert scale. In the validation study, construct and content validity, responsiveness, and feasibility of the questionnaire were assessed at 2 time points. A 26-item questionnaire was created following open-item generation by n = 72 patients. In the validation study, 3 items perceived as most relevant by patients were: "to be free of pain" (mean: 3.6 on a scale of 0-4), "to be free of inflammation" (mean: 3.6), "to have no more scars" (mean: 3.1). Significant correlations of PBI-HS at follow-up visit were found with the physical global assessment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS-PGA) (r = -0.471; p = 0.000), number of inflammatory lesions (r = -0.359; p = 0.005), and DLQI (r = -0.383; p = 0.003), indicating less disease burden in patients with higher treatment benefits. The PBI-HS is a feasible and valid instrument to assess patient-reported treatment benefits in hidradenitis suppurativa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.