Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047159›Full record

ArticleCroatian medical journal2025

Exploring awareness and perceptions of palliative care: a descriptive cross-sectional survey study in Central Europe.

Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Nicole Posch, Andrea Siebenhofer, Zlata Ožvačić Adžić, Erika Zelko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Croatian medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ulrike Spary-KainzUlrike Spary-Kainz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6-WEST, Stiegenhaus P/7.OG, 8010 Graz, Austria, ulrike.spary-kainz@medunigraz.at.
Nicole Posch
Andrea Siebenhofer
Zlata Ožvačić Adžić
Erika Zelko

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess awareness, knowledge, and preferences regarding palliative care in two Central European countries (Slovenia and Croatia) and the Austrian federal state of Styria. The study explored differences in the sources of information, public perceptions, and preferred settings for end-of-life care.

methodsIn this descriptive cross-sectional survey, we enrolled a community-based sample of adults (≥18 years) residing in the three regions. Propensity score matching was applied to balance demographic variables in the analysis. Overall and matched samples were reported for the three regions.

resultsThe study enrolled 1586 respondents; 78.2% had at least heard of palliative care. In the matched sample (n=462), respondents from Austria had the highest awareness of palliative care goals (74.4%), and those from Slovenia had the highest preference for obtaining information from traditional media (54.4%). Opinions on death discussions varied significantly; in Austria, there was the highest percentage (69.5%) of respondents who felt death was insufficiently discussed in society. The preferred end-of-life care setting was home, with Austrians having the highest preference for this setting (70.8%).

conclusionThe study revealed notable disparities in awareness, knowledge, and preferences regarding palliative care, although the sample size varied between countries. These differences should be addressed by tailored communication strategies and public health campaigns, which should align health care services with the preferences and needs of the population. The findings provide insights into how to improve end-of-life care and enhance public understanding of palliative services in three Central European regions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePalliative CareTerminal CareAdultAgedAttitude to DeathAustriaCroatiaCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSloveniaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40047159
PMCPMC11947979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.