Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047058›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

Nutritional Education in Medical Curricula and Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review on the Knowledge Deficit Amongst Medical Students and Doctors.

Nasr Khiri, Kristy Howells

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nasr KhiriKent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, UK.
Kristy HowellsCanterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-7532

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNon-communicable diseases (NCDs), accounting for 74% of deaths worldwide (World Health Organization 2024), are a major health concern and are often the result of poor dietary habits. To reduce the prevalence of chronic diseases healthcare professionals must encourage healthy eating, and therefore require the appropriate nutritional knowledge and skills. This scoping review critically synthesises the literature on nutrition education to understand why there is a gap in nutrition knowledge and skills among medical students and doctors (MSAD) in English-speaking countries, and the solutions which have been proposed in the literature to close this gap.

methodsThis scoping review adhered to PRISMA Scr guidelines outlined by Tricco et al. (2018) and used four online databases: PubMed; WebOfScience; Embase and ERIC as well as grey literature sources: Google; Bing and Perplexity AI, published within the last 10 years, from 2014 to 2024. Studies investigating medical students/doctors nutrition education/knowledge were included. Data analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's (2012) six-step thematic analysis approach and the Delve qualitative coding software analysis tool was used to identify the two principal themes and the 20 sub-themes. The PICO tool was also used for question analysis.

resultsFrom the 674 records identified, 28 papers met the inclusion criteria for full data extraction, analysis and synthesis. The results identified four reasons for the gap in nutrition knowledge, including insufficient curriculum time dedicated to nutrition education, perceptions and confidence, stigmas and health habits, and challenges in clinical practice. The review also identified four potential solutions to minimise this gap, including curriculum changes, enforcement of standardised nutrition education guidelines, integration of nutrition in clinical practice and promotion of a multidisciplinary approach to nutrition education.

conclusionThis scoping review shows that there are multiple complex reasons for the gap in nutrition knowledge and understanding. This is due to education institutional reasons; perceptions and confidence on nutrition; stigmas related to nutrition and being able to talk about nutrition; personal health habits; and challenges in clinical practice. Solutions to reduce the gap were identified and it is recommended that there are curricular innovations to incorporate nutrition education throughout medical training; standardisation and implementation of national competency standards; integration of nutrition into clinical practice; enhancement of postgraduate education pathways in nutrition; and the development of a multidisciplinary approach in medical education involving dietitians and other healthcare professionals. By enacting and supporting the recommendations and solutions would then improve patient care and likely contribute to better eating habits worldwide, thereby reducing the burden of NCDs to both patients and healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, MedicalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritional SciencesPhysiciansStudents, MedicalHumansknowledge deficitmedical curriculamedical students and doctorsnutrition education

Identifiers

PMID40047058
PMCPMC11883500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.