Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Non-ischemic phenotypes of low-risk chest pain patients based on exercise stress echocardiography: a pilot study.

Tamara Ryabova, Elena Abramenko, Ivan Yolgin, Konstantin Zavadovsky, Vyacheslav Ryabov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamara RyabovaCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
Elena AbramenkoCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
Ivan YolginCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
Konstantin ZavadovskyCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
Vyacheslav RyabovCardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A significant proportion (∼85%) of low-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients do not receive objective confirmation of ischemia by stress echocardiography (SE), yet remain a healthcare burden due to lower long-term survival and overuse of medical services. We aimed to identify non-ischemic phenotypes in low-risk NSTE-ACS patients by analyzing a wide range of parameters available during exercise SE. Methods: Inpatients [ Results: The majority (90%) of patients presented with one or more abnormal stress biomarkers. Cluster analysis revealed six phenotypes, four of which were classified as non-ischemic and identified in 65 (63%) patients. Non-ischemic phenotypes differed in the prevalence of hypertensive response, reduced CR, and reduced HRR. Among patients with non-ischemic phenotypes, the incidence of coronary artery disease was low (23%). Conclusions: Four non-ischemic phenotypes of low-risk NSTE-ACS patients were identified: "near-normal type," "inotropic insufficiency type," "hypertensive type," and "chronotropic insufficiency type." Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term significance of the obtained phenotypes.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromechest painechocardiographyphenotypestress echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID40046963
PMCPMC11879951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.