ArticleOTO open
Prevalence of Speech and Swallowing Dysfunction and Intervention Among Individuals With Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacological and speech-language pathology management of dysphagia in patients with myasthenia gravis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- An Exploratory Retrospective Analysis of Racial Disparities in Fall-Related Injuries Among Black and White Breast Cancer Survivors Receiving Chemotherapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Myasthenia gravis and nutrition.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Morning-Predominant Dysphagia in Myasthenia Gravis: A Report of Two Cases with Tongue Pressure Measurement.Case reports in neurologyArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the prevalence of dysphonia and dysphagia among individuals with myasthenia gravis (MG) and the frequency of utilization of speech and swallow evaluation and therapy. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Methods: The cohort includes adults (≥18 years) with and without MG diagnosis. Propensity score matching was used before generating odds ratios (OR) of receiving speech and swallow diagnoses including dysarthria, dysphonia, dysphagia, and aspiration pneumonia. Subsequently, rates of individuals with MG receiving voice and swallow evaluation and therapy were analyzed. Results: In this cohort, the prevalence of voice, speech, and swallowing pathology was higher in those with MG than without, including aspiration pneumonia (3.7% vs 0.7%), dysarthria (9.2% vs 0.5%), dysphonia (4.4% vs 1.2%), and dysphagia (24.9% vs 4.7%). ORs for diagnosis of each type of pathology were higher after MG diagnosis, including for aspiration pneumonia (OR: 2.69 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.95-3.70]), dysarthria (OR: 9.28 [95% CI: 6.67-12.92]), dysphonia (OR: 2.63 [95% CI: 1.97-3.53]), and dysphagia (OR: 4.18 [95% CI: 3.62-4.83]). Finally, the rate of receiving a swallow and/or voice evaluation and/or therapy was low among all individuals with MG (16.9%) but higher among those with MG with any speech or swallow symptom (47.0%), MG with dysarthria and/or dysphonia (56.2%), and MG with dysphagia and/or aspiration pneumonia (49.0%). Conclusion: Rates of dysarthria, dysphonia, dysphagia, and aspiration pneumonia were far more common among those with MG than without, but formal speech and/or swallow evaluation was not routine. These findings suggest a need for more routine speech-language pathology evaluation among individuals with MG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.