Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046904›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2025

Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of uveal melanoma: advances and applications.

Albert K Dadzie, Sabrina P Iddir, Sanjay Ganesh, Behrouz Ebrahimi, Mojtaba Rahimi, Mansour Abtahi, Taeyoon Son, Michael J Heiferman, Xincheng Yao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology Imaging: Approximation to Ocular Histopathology.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  2. Potential of Nanoparticle-Based Phototherapies for Future Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Albert K DadzieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Sabrina P IddirDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Sanjay GaneshDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Behrouz EbrahimiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Mojtaba RahimiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Mansour AbtahiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Taeyoon SonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Michael J HeifermanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Xincheng YaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
UIC K12 Independent Clinical Vision Scientist Development ProgramK12EY021475 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ALI R DJALILIAN, CHARLOTTE E JOSLIN · 2011 to 2026
$6.7M
Functional imaging of retinal photoreceptorsR01EY023522 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI YAO, XINCHENG · 2014 to 2024
$3.5M
Differential artery-vein analysis in OCT angiography for objective classification of diabetic retinopathyR01EY030842 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI LIM, JENNIFER IRENE, YAO, XINCHENG · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
Functional tomography of neurovascular coupling interactions in healthy and diseased retinasR01EY030101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI YAO, XINCHENG · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY021475NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023522NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030101NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in machine learning and deep learning have the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis of melanocytic choroidal tumors, including uveal melanoma, a potentially life-threatening eye cancer. Traditional machine learning methods rely heavily on manually selected image features, which can limit diagnostic accuracy and lead to variability in results. In contrast, deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are capable of automatically analyzing medical images, identifying complex patterns, and enhancing diagnostic precision. This review evaluates recent studies that apply machine learning and deep learning approaches to classify uveal melanoma using imaging modalities such as fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ultrasound. The review critically examines each study's research design, methodology, and reported performance metrics, discussing strengths as well as limitations. While fundus photography is the predominant imaging modality being used in current research, integrating multiple imaging techniques, such as OCT and ultrasound, may enhance diagnostic accuracy by combining surface and structural information about the tumor. Key limitations across studies include small dataset sizes, limited external validation, and a reliance on single imaging modalities, all of which restrict model generalizability in clinical settings. Metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) indicate that deep learning models have the potential to outperform traditional methods, supporting their further development for integration into clinical workflows. Future research should aim to address current limitations by developing multimodal models that leverage larger, diverse datasets and rigorous validation, thereby paving the way for more comprehensive, reliable diagnostic tools in ocular oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMelanomaUveal NeoplasmsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonographyUveal Melanomaartificial intelligencechoroidal tumorsconvolutional neural networksdeep learningmachine learningocular oncologyuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID40046904
PMCPMC11879745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.