ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2025
Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of uveal melanoma: advances and applications.
Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology Imaging: Approximation to Ocular Histopathology.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Potential of Nanoparticle-Based Phototherapies for Future Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Discriminative Index: A Novel Indicator for Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms in Laboratory Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Deep Learning Optimisation Strategies for Uveal Melanoma Detection Using Ultra-Widefield Photography.Research square · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Surface Tumors: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Attention-Based Multimodal Deep Learning for Uveal Melanoma Classification Using Ultra-Widefield Fundus Images and Ocular Ultrasound.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Precision Oncology in Ocular Melanoma: Integrating Molecular and Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Data-driven strategies for immunoradiotherapy in uveal melanoma: the role of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Uveal Melanoma.Anticancer research · 2025Review
- Uveal Pigmented Lesion Classification, Detection, and Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Tasks.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Optical Coherence Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Uveal Melanoma: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating single-cell omics and materials science for uveal melanoma: from mechanistic insights to precision therapeutics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in machine learning and deep learning have the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis of melanocytic choroidal tumors, including uveal melanoma, a potentially life-threatening eye cancer. Traditional machine learning methods rely heavily on manually selected image features, which can limit diagnostic accuracy and lead to variability in results. In contrast, deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are capable of automatically analyzing medical images, identifying complex patterns, and enhancing diagnostic precision. This review evaluates recent studies that apply machine learning and deep learning approaches to classify uveal melanoma using imaging modalities such as fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ultrasound. The review critically examines each study's research design, methodology, and reported performance metrics, discussing strengths as well as limitations. While fundus photography is the predominant imaging modality being used in current research, integrating multiple imaging techniques, such as OCT and ultrasound, may enhance diagnostic accuracy by combining surface and structural information about the tumor. Key limitations across studies include small dataset sizes, limited external validation, and a reliance on single imaging modalities, all of which restrict model generalizability in clinical settings. Metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) indicate that deep learning models have the potential to outperform traditional methods, supporting their further development for integration into clinical workflows. Future research should aim to address current limitations by developing multimodal models that leverage larger, diverse datasets and rigorous validation, thereby paving the way for more comprehensive, reliable diagnostic tools in ocular oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.