ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis for Bacterial STIs: Prescribing Patterns, Use, Short-term Outcomes Among 2083 Patients in a Los Angeles Federally Qualified Health Care Program, and Implications for Widespread Use.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Implementation of Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis at an Infectious Diseases Clinic in the Southern United States.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2026Article
- Engagement in Care and Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Among Patients Prescribed Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis at a Midwestern HIV/Preexposure Prophylaxis Clinic.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Post-exposure prophylaxis with doxycycline (DoxyPEP) to prevent STIs in a real-world setting: the PRIDOX study.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis Is Effective and Highly Acceptable in an Urban Public Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic: Philadelphia, 2019-2023.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Article
- DoxyPEP: Opportunities for Expansion.Journal of primary care & community healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have risen dramatically over the past decades. Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (DP) is a novel intervention to prevent bacterial STIs. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials reported high DP efficacy at preventing syphilis and chlamydia in cisgender men who have sex with men and transgender women. Methods: We abstracted data from the electronic health records of 2083 patients at the Los Angeles LGBT Center (the Center) who were prescribed DP between 2019 and June 2024. Patient information included race, income, gender, sex, DP prescriptions, and STI tests dating back to 1998. Results: More than half of the patients prescribed DP at the Center were White, and 48.1% were between 31 and 40 years old. Most of these patients were not diagnosed with an STI in the previous year but ever having an STI correlated with early DP initiation. We demonstrate high real-world DP effectiveness in preventing infections with syphilis (86.4%) and chlamydia (89.7%), and moderate effectiveness for gonorrhea (54.7%), all remarkably similar to published clinical trials. DP use was highly variable, and DP failure for syphilis or chlamydia occurred only in patients with low DP use. There was similar effectiveness for chlamydia and gonorrhea regardless of anatomical site (rectal or throat swabs or urine sample). Conclusions: We show that DP is highly effective at STI prevention in a real-world setting and describe patterns of DP prescribing and use, in addition to STI testing, that can directly inform best clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.