Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046893›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Doxycycline Postexposure Prophylaxis for Bacterial STIs: Prescribing Patterns, Use, Short-term Outcomes Among 2083 Patients in a Los Angeles Federally Qualified Health Care Program, and Implications for Widespread Use.

Joseph Osmundson, Ian W Holloway, Raul Macias Gil, J Trevor Jann, Chenglin Hong, Robert K Bolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DoxyPEP: Opportunities for Expansion.Journal of primary care & community health
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph OsmundsonDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4359-2750
Ian W HollowayDepartment of Social Welfare, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Raul Macias GilDivision of Infectious Diseases, Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA.
J Trevor JannLos Angeles LGBT Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Chenglin HongSchool of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Robert K BolanLos Angeles LGBT Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-1052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have risen dramatically over the past decades. Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (DP) is a novel intervention to prevent bacterial STIs. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials reported high DP efficacy at preventing syphilis and chlamydia in cisgender men who have sex with men and transgender women. Methods: We abstracted data from the electronic health records of 2083 patients at the Los Angeles LGBT Center (the Center) who were prescribed DP between 2019 and June 2024. Patient information included race, income, gender, sex, DP prescriptions, and STI tests dating back to 1998. Results: More than half of the patients prescribed DP at the Center were White, and 48.1% were between 31 and 40 years old. Most of these patients were not diagnosed with an STI in the previous year but ever having an STI correlated with early DP initiation. We demonstrate high real-world DP effectiveness in preventing infections with syphilis (86.4%) and chlamydia (89.7%), and moderate effectiveness for gonorrhea (54.7%), all remarkably similar to published clinical trials. DP use was highly variable, and DP failure for syphilis or chlamydia occurred only in patients with low DP use. There was similar effectiveness for chlamydia and gonorrhea regardless of anatomical site (rectal or throat swabs or urine sample). Conclusions: We show that DP is highly effective at STI prevention in a real-world setting and describe patterns of DP prescribing and use, in addition to STI testing, that can directly inform best clinical practice.

Indexed as

bacterial STIsdoxycycline postexposure prophylaxisdoxyPEPpreventionsexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID40046893
PMCPMC11879542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.