Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046887›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Illuminating the Challenges and Diagnostic Utility of Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in Suspected Infective Endocarditis: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Myeongji Kim, Pansachee Damronglerd, Sofia Molina Garcia, Zachary A Yetmar, Samrah Razi, Nischal Ranganath, Maryam Mahmood, Omar M Abu Saleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Case Report ofCase reports in infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. ASM case reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Quantifying the Uncultured: Microbial Cell-Free DNA Trends in Legionella Endocarditis.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Myeongji KimDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3568-0224
Pansachee DamronglerdDivision of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Sofia Molina GarciaDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1512-3770
Zachary A YetmarDepartment of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Samrah RaziDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Nischal RanganathDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-6214
Maryam MahmoodDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-2347
Omar M Abu SalehDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4955-5544

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening infection often challenging to diagnose, particularly in culture-negative cases. Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing has shown potential for detecting pathogens in IE. However, its clinical utility, diagnostic impact, and limitations remain debated. This study evaluates its use in diagnosing and managing IE in a tertiary care setting. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent mcfDNA sequencing via the Karius test for suspected IE at Mayo Clinic Rochester between December 2019 and February 2024. Diagnostic classification followed the 2023 Duke-International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases criteria. Data on demographics, clinical features, routine microbiologic workup, and mcfDNA sequencing results were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate diagnostic utility and treatment impact. Results: Among 141 patients, 66 had a diagnosis of IE, with mcfDNA sequencing identifying pathogens in 60.6% of them, compared with 39.4% with routine workup. mcfDNA sequencing was the sole microbiologic test with positive results in 33.3% of patients, leading to antimicrobial adjustments in 50.0% of that group. Clinically insignificant mcfDNA sequence detection occurred in 28.6% of patients without a diagnosis of IE. Conclusions: mcfDNA sequencing is a valuable adjunctive tool for diagnosing culture-negative IE and guiding antimicrobial therapy when clinical suspicion is high. However, its utility depends on appropriate clinical context, highlighting the need for careful test interpretation and further prospective studies to assess patient-centered outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

culture-negative endocarditisinfective endocarditismetagenomicsmicrobial cell-free DNA sequencingmolecular diagnosticsnext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40046887
PMCPMC11879537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.