ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Clinicodemographic and Radiological Features of Infective Ring-Enhancing Brain Lesions: A 4-Year Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Referral Center.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiology and clinical characteristics of brain abscess in adults from 3 tertiary hospitals in Singapore - a 11-year multicenter retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Can 3D T1 Post-Contrast MRI in A Radiomics-Machine Learning Model Distinguish Infective from Neoplastic Ring-Enhancing Brain Lesions? An Exploratory Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The diagnostic evaluation of ring-enhancing brain lesions (REBLs) is challenging, especially in immunocompromised patients. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the clinicodemographic and radiological features among patients presenting with REBLs to a tertiary referral center. Methods: Radiological reports of all patients who underwent brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging between 1 November 2013 and 31 October 2017 were filtered for terms indicative of REBLs. Infectious diseases physicians reviewed the medical records to confirm the diagnosis. Results: Over the 4-year study period, there were 42 patients with infective REBLs and 249 with neoplastic REBLs. Pyogenic brain abscesses (PBAs) (20 of 42 [47.6%]) were the most common cause of infective REBLs, followed by tuberculous brain abscesses (TBAs) (9 of 42 [21.4%]) and Conclusions: Our study has revealed important distinguishing features between infective REBLs and neoplastic REBLs and between PBAs, TBAs, and NBAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.