Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046862›Full record

ArticlePsychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2023

Preventing the Gaps in Psychedelic Research from Becoming Practice Pitfalls: A Translational Research Agenda.

Andrew Penn, Rachel Yehuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew PennDepartment of Community Health Systems, University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5552-7078
Rachel YehudaIcahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reemergence of psychedelic medicines as clinical treatments has generated considerable interest in both professional and popular arenas. Although evidence is promising for psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), there is much that is not yet known and needs to be researched so as to understand how to safely and effectively utilize PAT in clinical populations and to most effectively deploy PAT to patients. In addition, non-clinical stakeholders introduce interests and agendas that may differ from those of clinicians. This article reviews the history of how psychedelics were initially outlawed and then introduces research questions that will help to fill these gaps in knowledge.

Indexed as

PATpsychedelicspsychotherapyresearch agendaresearch gaps

Identifiers

PMID40046862
PMCPMC11658673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.