Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046846›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Hierarchy in Structuring of Resource Selection: Understanding Elk Selection Across Space, Time, and Movement Strategies.

Storm Crews, Nathaniel D Rayl, Mathew W Alldredge, Eric J Bergman, Chuck R Anderson, Eric H VanNatta, Joseph D Holbrook, Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Storm CrewsCooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory Southern Illinois University Carbondale Illinois USA.
Nathaniel D RaylMammals Research Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife Grand Junction Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-2764
Mathew W AlldredgeMammals Research Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7133-9621
Eric J BergmanMammals Research Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife Fort Collins Colorado USA.
Chuck R AndersonMammals Research Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife Fort Collins Colorado USA.
Eric H VanNattaTerrestrial Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife Steamboat Springs Colorado USA.
Joseph D HolbrookHaub School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-7690
Guillaume Bastille-RousseauCooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory Southern Illinois University Carbondale Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-639X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement is a fundamental aspect of animal ecology that varies across space, time, and among individuals or groups within a population. Broad-scale patterns of animal movement are often classified into different movement strategies, such as resident, nomadic, or migratory. While landscape-level environmental patterns can predict the presence of different movement strategies in an area, elucidating how these patterns downscale to fine-scale resource selection behaviors remains a challenge. Partially migratory systems, where both migrants and residents coexist, offer a unique opportunity to address these questions. Using tracking data from four Rocky Mountain elk (

Indexed as

consistencyGPS telemetryhabitat selection functionmovement ecologynet squared displacementnormalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)partial migrationungulate

Identifiers

PMID40046846
PMCPMC11882307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.