Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046831›Full record

ArticleBMJ oncology2025

Genetics, primary care records and lifestyle factors for short-term dynamic risk prediction of colorectal cancer: prospective study of asymptomatic and symptomatic UK Biobank participants.

Samantha Ip, Hannah Harrison, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Matthew E Barclay, Jonathan Tyrer, Joe Dennis, Xin Yang, Michael Lush, Cristina Renzi, Nora Pashayan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Samantha Ip *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9162-6727
Hannah Harrison *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-852X
Juliet A Usher-SmithDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-2531
Matthew E BarclayDepartment of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-1922
Jonathan TyrerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Joe DennisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Xin YangDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michael LushDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Cristina RenziUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3845-9493
Nora PashayanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0843-2468
Spiros DenaxasInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9612-7791
Georgios LyratzopoulosDepartment of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2873-7421
Antonis C AntoniouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Angela M WoodDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the contributions of polygenic scores, primary care records (presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) and lifestyle factors, for short-term risk prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) in general and symptomatic individuals. Methods and analysis: This prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank with follow-up until 2018. It included 160 507 participants with linked primary care records and a subcohort of 42 782 participants with recent CRC-related symptoms. The outcome was the first-recorded CRC diagnosis within 2 years. Dynamic risk models with time-varying predictors were derived using a super-landmark framework. Model discrimination was assessed through Harrel's C-index, and predictor contributions to model discrimination were evaluated using inclusion-order-agnostic Shapley values. Results: C-indices (95% CIs) were 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) and 0.69 (0.68 to 0.70) for the general and symptomatic participants, respectively. Shapley contributions to model discrimination (95% CIs) were core predictors (eg, age, sex) 33% (25% to 42%) (symptomatic: 34% (9% to 75%)), polygenic scores 16% (8% to 26%) (8% (-21% to 35%)), primary care blood tests 32% (19% to 43%) (41% (16% to 73%)), medical history 11% (4% to 17%) (9% (-25% to 37%)), lifestyle factors 6% (0% to 11%) (-5% (-32% to 13.4%)) and symptoms 3% (-2% to 7%) (13% (-19% to 41%)). Conclusions: Polygenic scores contribute substantially to short-term risk prediction for CRC in both general and symptomatic populations; however, the contribution of information in primary care records (including presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) is greater. Lifestyle factors not routinely collected in primary care contribute minimally.

Indexed as

BiostatisticsBowel cancerCancer screeningColorectal cancerGenetic markers

Identifiers

PMID40046831
PMCPMC11880779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.