ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Biomechanical analysis of spinal range of motion and intervertebral disc loadings in normal and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis models.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comprehensive narrative review of scoliosis in children and adolescents: epidemiology, screening strategies, therapeutic interventions, and biomechanical research.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Associations between physical fitness and idiopathic scoliosis in Chinese adolescents: A case-control study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning based screening and regular assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using wearable IMU sensors.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Segmental asymmetry and multiplanar motion of the lumbar spine: Cadaveric insights into spinal pathologies.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Thoracolumbar Biomechanical Analysis of Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Across Roussouly Classifications.JOR spine · 2025Article
- For severe and rigid adult idiopathic scoliosis, does an optimal extent of posterior intervertebral release exist? A finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: While the Lenke classification enhances our structural understanding of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the biomechanical implications for spinal range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral disc (IVD) loadings remain unclear. This study aims to quantitatively explore and compare these biomechanical responses in normal thoracolumbar spines and those with various curvatures of Lenke types under pure bending conditions. Methods: The baseline thoracolumbar finite element (FE) model was derived from a comprehensive human body FE model, validated, and calibrated against spinal responses under dynamic compression and quasi-static bending conditions. Using mesh morphing, AIS models of Lenke 1, Lenke 2, Lenke 3, and Lenke 5 were established to represent their respective spinal curvatures. Pure bending moments of ±7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were applied to both normal and AIS models. Global spinal ROM and ROM of spinal segments T1-T6, T7-T12, and L1-Sacrum were measured under each loading condition. IVD mechanical loadings, including force, moment, and VonMises stress, were also evaluated and compared across all models. Results: AIS models showed higher principal ROM compared to the normal model, with Lenke 2 having the highest ROM from T1-Sacrum and Lenke 3 the highest ROM from T6-12. AIS models exhibited more asymmetry in segmental ROM, particularly in the lumbar spine during lateral bending and axial rotation. IVD mechanical loadings varied significantly between normal and AIS models, influenced by spinal curvature types. AIS models had higher secondary moments and shear forces, especially under flexion-extension. The highest stress was mostly observed in the frontal IVD regions under flexion which was greatly reduced under extension. Lateral bending caused the highest stress predominantly on the same side as the loading direction in the IVD regions. The IVDs of T6-T7 and T12-L1 showed even stress distribution under axial rotation, while the right IVD regions of L5-Sacrum sustained the highest stress under right axial rotation, and the left regions under left axial rotation. In Lenke 3 and Lenke 5 models, the right (concave) regions of the T12-L1 IVD consistently sustained higher stress levels, regardless of the loading conditions applied. Conclusion: This study underscores significant biomechanical differences between normal and AIS models, revealing intricate interactions within scoliotic spines and enhancing our understanding of AIS biomechanics. These insights can aid in better diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. Extension-focused therapeutic exercises may reduce stress on anterior IVDs, potentially lowering the risk of low back pain or disc herniation, while careful management of rotational exercises can help minimize stress in the lower lumbar regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.