ReviewInternational journal of health sciences
Emerging hybrid techniques in aortic valve interventions: A systematic review of integrating surgical and transcatheter approaches.
Review in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Between Air and Artery: A History of Cardiopulmonary Bypass and the Rise of Modern Cardiac Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Hydrogels in Cardiac Surgery: Versatile Platforms for Tissue Repair, Adhesion Prevention, and Localized Therapeutics.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review examines the development and clinical application of hybrid aortic valve interventions that integrate surgical and transcatheter techniques. It focuses on the efficacy, outcomes, and innovations of these procedures, particularly for patients at moderate-to-high surgical risk. Methods: A comprehensive database search (PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus) was conducted from August 20 to October 10, 2024. Studies on aortic valve interventions combining surgical and transcatheter approaches were included, encompassing case studies, series, cohort studies, and reviews. Non-English articles, gray literature, cadaveric, and animal studies were excluded. Screening followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2023 guidelines, with two rounds performed. Formal quality assessment was omitted due to study heterogeneity. Results: Out of 2046 initial articles, 495 unique studies remained after duplicate removal, and 65 articles were selected for analysis. Hybrid aortic valve procedures, blending surgical techniques with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, demonstrated improved outcomes, including shorter recovery times, reduced complications, and personalized treatment options for moderate-risk patients. Conclusion: Hybrid aortic valve interventions mark a significant advancement, enhancing patient-specific care and outcomes. Continued innovation in materials, techniques, and clinician training is crucial to improve durability, long-term outcomes, and broader adoption of these minimally invasive procedures. Future research should address these areas to further optimize cardiovascular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40046796PMC11877059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.