ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Simulated driving behavior over the adult age span.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Motor vehicle accidents remain a leading cause of accidental death worldwide. Death and injury rates are particularly high for both young inexperienced drivers and elderly drivers. Understanding the behavioral changes that are associated with maturation and aging could inform assessments of driving performance and lead to new measures identifying at-risk drivers. To shed further light on such effects, this study aims to characterize simulated driving behavior across and within age groups using a large driving simulation dataset. Methods: The analyzed dataset consisted of 112 participants [47/112 (42%) female] between the ages of 17 and 85 (average ± standard deviation: 54 ± 22 years). Participants performed navigation in scenarios modeled after the standard licensing test of Ontario, Canada, which included a series of turns at intersections with different levels of complexity (e.g., involving oncoming traffic or pedestrians) and levels of distraction (requiring auditory responses to common-knowledge questions). Behavioral metrics were defined and investigated not only for the full completion of each task but also based on common subtasks (e.g., braking at an intersection), which were then compared across and within age groups (young, middle-aged, old). Results: Overall, young adults behaved similarly to middle-aged adults for basic tasks but showed differences during traffic navigation subtasks when distracted, such as starting to decelerate significantly later when approaching intersections. Old drivers, on the other hand, drove at lower average speed, stopped earlier at intersections, and left increased distances to pedestrians, but required significantly more time to complete the driving tasks. Conclusion: With rich detail arising from intra-task quantification, the results were consistent with and additive to previous literature showcasing that compared to middle-aged adults, young adults showed performance suggestive of riskier driving behavior, and old adults showed performance suggestive of caution consequent to declining driving ability. In particular, the intra-task quantification revealed that the driving of young adults was more impacted by the presence of distraction (e.g., delayed decelerating), whereas old adults prioritized safe driving (e.g., correctly braking at intersections) over responding to distractions. The study may be used as motivation for future studies of driving safety and accident prevention, and informed assessment of governmental regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.