ArticleFrontiers in big data2025
Next-generation approach to skin disorder prediction employing hybrid deep transfer learning.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of transfer learning in sunflower disease detection: advances, challenges, and future directions.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Skin diseases significantly impact individuals' health and mental wellbeing. However, their classification remains challenging due to complex lesion characteristics, overlapping symptoms, and limited annotated datasets. Traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) often struggle with generalization, leading to suboptimal classification performance. To address these challenges, this study proposes a Hybrid Deep Transfer Learning Method (HDTLM) that integrates DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB0 for improved skin disease prediction. Methods: The proposed hybrid model leverages DenseNet121's dense connectivity for capturing intricate patterns and EfficientNetB0's computational efficiency and scalability. A dataset comprising 19 skin conditions with 19,171 images was used for training and validation. The model was evaluated using multiple performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Additionally, a comparative analysis was conducted against state-of-the-art models such as DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0, VGG19, MobileNetV2, and AlexNet. Results: The proposed HDTLM achieved a training accuracy of 98.18% and a validation accuracy of 97.57%. It consistently outperformed baseline models, achieving a precision of 0.95, recall of 0.96, F1-score of 0.95, and an overall accuracy of 98.18%. The results demonstrate the hybrid model's superior ability to generalize across diverse skin disease categories. Discussion: The findings underscore the effectiveness of the HDTLM in enhancing skin disease classification, particularly in scenarios with significant domain shifts and limited labeled data. By integrating complementary strengths of DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB0, the proposed model provides a robust and scalable solution for automated dermatological diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.