ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Integration of multi-omics profiling reveals an epigenetic-based molecular classification of lung adenocarcinoma: implications for drug sensitivity and immunotherapy response prediction.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathway-level epigenetic modeling illuminates the methylation architecture to asthma risk across tissues.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Article
- ULSL: Unified Latent and Similarity Learning for robust multi-omics cancer subtype identification.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- [Integrative Analysis of Multi-source Public Databases to Screen Core Genes for Constructing A Prognostic Risk Model in Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Article
- Informatics at the Frontier of Cancer Research.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Unconventional Immunotherapies in Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with high heterogeneity and poor prognosis. Epigenetic dysregulation plays a crucial role in LUAD progression, yet its potential in molecular classification and therapeutic prediction remains largely unexplored. Methods: We performed an integrated multi-omics analysis of 432 LUAD patients from TCGA and 398 patients from GEO datasets. Using consensus clustering and random survival forest (RSF) algorithms, we established an epigenetic-based molecular classification system and constructed a prognostic model. The model's performance was validated in multiple independent cohorts, and its biological implications were investigated through comprehensive functional analyses. Results: We identified two distinct molecular subtypes (CS1 and CS2) with significant differences in epigenetic modification patterns, immune microenvironment, and clinical outcomes (P = 0.005). The RSF-based prognostic model demonstrated robust performance in both training (TCGA-LUAD) and validation (GSE72094) cohorts, with time-dependent AUC values ranging from 0.625 to 0.694. Low-risk patients exhibited enhanced immune cell infiltration, particularly CD8 Conclusion: Our study establishes a novel epigenetic-based classification system and predictive model for LUAD, providing valuable insights into patient stratification and personalized treatment selection. The model's ability to predict immunotherapy response and drug sensitivity offers practical guidance for clinical decision-making, potentially improving patient outcomes through precision medicine approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.