ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Potential efficacy and mechanisms of icariin for the animal model of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research Progress on Icariin Promoting Bone Injury Repair and Regeneration.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Icariin (ICA), one of the main active components of Methods: According to the established search strategy, we searched 14 studies from eight databases from their inception dates to November 2024. The CAMARADES 10-item checklist was utilized to evaluate the methodological quality of the stuies and Rev-Man 5.3 software to analyze differences in outcome indicators. Results: The quality score for the included articles ranges from 1/10 to 6/10 with an average of 4.5 and the defects in aspects of blinding assessment of outcome, randomization and sample size calculation are the main losing points. Compared with the control group, 10 stuies reported ICA could partially improve bone pathology including reducing the empty of bone lacunae, maturing osteoblasts of ONFH and decreasing chondroid bone matrix and fibrous connective tissue. Eight stuies indicates that ICA could improve bone-related parameters under imageology including F-BMD, Tb.N, Tb.Th, BV/TV and Tb. Sp. Discussion: The preclinical systematic review provided preliminary evidence that ICA partially reversing ONFH in animal models probably via promoting angiogenesis, anti-apoptosis, and regulating the activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Randomization, blinding and sample size calculation should be focused on in future studies of ONFH. These findings suggest that ICA is a potential candidate for further clinical trials of ONFH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.