Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046720›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Improving the health of the rural population in India through bundling WASH practices.

Trung Thanh Nguyen, Dil Bahadur Rahut, Raja Timilsina, Manh Hung Do, Tetsushi Sonobe, Navneet Manchanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trung Thanh NguyenInstitute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Dil Bahadur RahutAsian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo, Japan.
Raja TimilsinaAsian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo, Japan.
Manh Hung DoInstitute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Tetsushi SonobeAsian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo, Japan.
Navneet ManchandaThe New Delhi Office, World Bank Group, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving access to clean and safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) for all is one of the Sustainable Development Goals. However, most efforts to improve access to clean and safe WASH focus on a single practice, resulting in a low adoption rate and limited impact. This study analyses data from 63,732 rural households from the 76th Round of the Indian National Sample Survey in 2018 to (i) identify the factors associated with the adoption of WASH practices using logit estimations, (ii) explore adoption disparities via the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method, and (iii) assess the health impacts of having one vs. a combination of several, i.e., bundles of practices, using the heteroskedasticity-based instrumental variable approach. The findings reveal that (i) the wealth status of rural households and education levels of household heads are significant factors associated with the adoption, (ii) female-headed households and those belonging to scheduled castes and tribes are disadvantaged in adoption, and (iii) bundling several practices is more effective in mitigating health problems compared to single-practice adoption. Therefore, prioritizing bundled practices for impoverished households, those with lower educational attainment, female-headed households, and scheduled castes and tribes is crucial for enhancing health outcomes and alleviating the disease burden in rural India.

Indexed as

adoptionbundledisadvantagedimpactsanitation

Identifiers

PMID40046720
PMCPMC11879964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.