Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046703›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025

Comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane as maintenance inhalational anaesthetic agents for adult patients undergoing neurosurgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Hori Hariyanto, Monika Widiastuti, Carla Oktaviani Pandrya, Kevin Anderson Surya, William Audi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Automated tools in systematic reviews: Current trends.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hori HariyantoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-4406
Monika WidiastutiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6186-0245
Carla Oktaviani PandryaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4388-973X
Kevin Anderson SuryaFaculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2970-893X
William AudiFaculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2629-2291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Despite its superior blood-gas partition coefficient compared to sevoflurane, use of desflurane in neurosurgery is limited due to concerns about cerebral vasodilation and potential adverse haemodynamic effects. This study aims to systematically evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of desflurane and sevoflurane in neurosurgical procedures. Methods: A search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Europe PMC and Medline databases for articles published until 5 November 2024 using a combination of pertinent keywords. This review includes randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that analyse the comparison between desflurane and sevoflurane in neurosurgery. The risk of bias from each RCT was assessed using the Risk of Bias version 2 tool from Cochrane Collaboration. We utilised random-effects models to evaluate the mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) for the outcomes presented. Results: Fourteen trials, encompassing 904 patients, were included in the analysis. Our analysis revealed significantly faster recovery profiles with desflurane, including reduced emergence time [MD -2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.99, -1.52, Conclusion: This study suggests that desflurane anaesthesia offers faster recovery with a similar safety profile to sevoflurane for neurosurgery.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiacognitive recoverydesfluraneemergence timeextubationmeta-analysisneuroanaesthesianeurosurgerysevofluraneshort orientation memory concentration testsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40046703
PMCPMC11878358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.