Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046659›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Bonobos and chimpanzees overlap in sexual behaviour patterns during social tension.

Jake S Brooker, Christine E Webb, Edwin J C van Leeuwen, Stephanie Kordon, Frans B M de Waal, Zanna Clay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Drivers of same-sex sexual behaviour.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A comparative approach to the evolution of kissing.Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jake S BrookerDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-5384
Christine E WebbDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9757-729X
Edwin J C van LeeuwenAnimal Behaviour and Cognition, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CA, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-2182
Stephanie KordonDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1849-064X
Frans B M de WaalDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-6653
Zanna ClayDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3016-1732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual behaviour during tense social situations is extensively documented in various animals. Bonobos, our closest living relatives alongside chimpanzees, habitually perform genital contacts during social tension, which is thought to enhance cooperation and conflict management. While chimpanzees also engage in genital contacts during these contexts, the two sister species have yet to be compared systematically, which may have led to inaccurate assumptions. To address this, we directly compared genital and non-genital affiliation among sanctuary-living bonobos and chimpanzees during two socially tense contexts-post-conflict and pre-feeding. Following conflicts, we observed triadic affiliation between bystander-victim pairs and reconciliation between aggressor-victim pairs. Additionally, we experimentally induced a pre-feeding context to examine affiliative contact between group members. During post-conflict contexts, bonobos used genital contacts more than chimpanzees. However, both species used genital contacts comparably during pre-feeding affiliation, although female bonobos and male chimpanzees were most likely to initiate them. In addition, we found group-level variation indicating an influence of demographic factors. Our results indicate that chimpanzees and bonobos overlap significantly in their use of genital contacts during periods of social tension. Given similar evidence in humans, our results support the notion that this was a trait probably also present in our last common ancestor.

Indexed as

bonobochimpanzeereassurancesexual contactsocial tensionspecies variability

Identifiers

PMID40046659
PMCPMC11879624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.