ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Comprehensive Analysis of the Biomechanical Research of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Scientometric Approach.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has become a significant public health issue, with its prevalence increasing proportionally with age. Despite the considerable number of biomechanical studies reported on POP, there remains a lack of a systematic approach to summarize and synthesize all existing research. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was used as the data source to select literature published from 2003 to 2023 related to biomechanical research of POP. We employed various visualization software to generate scientific knowledge maps, facilitating data analysis and visual representation. Results: This study included 292 publications, comprising 252 research articles (86.3%) and 40 review articles (13.7%). The United States has emerged as a leading nation in terms of productivity, with the University of Porto making significant contributions. Robust partnerships are maintained by all countries and institutions involved. Moali PA stands out as the most prolific author, while Deprest J exhibits exemplary levels of collaboration. Notably, the journal Conclusion: This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the knowledge system and research directions of the biomechanics of POP, providing valuable guidance for future research endeavors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.