ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Healthcare Personnel Experiences With Health Literacy Sensitivity in Relation to Work Satisfaction and Stress: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A health literacy intervention for registered nurses: Development and feasibility testing.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Association between occupational health literacy and occupational stress among workers in metal mining, metallurgy and non-metallic manufacturing in Gansu, China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Associations Between Work-Related Factors, Mental Well-Being, and Health Literacy Sensitivity: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Healthcare Personnel.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To qualitatively explore healthcare personnel's (HCP) experiences with health literacy sensitivity in relation to work satisfaction and stress. Being HL sensitive means that HCP have adequate knowledge, skills, and attitudes to follow up on patients' HL needs. Methods: Four focus group interviews were conducted with 30 hCP from a medium-sized general hospital in Oslo, Norway. We used inductive thematic analysis developed by Braun & Clark. NVivo v12 software assisted data analysis. Results: Three main themes were identified: (1) HCP experiences with HL (2) HCP experience barriers with HL sensitivity, and (3) HCP collaboration and communication are essential for HL. Variability in HL understanding among HCP may lead to challenges in providing patient-centered care. Factors such as heavy workloads, cultural barriers, and organizational limitations hinder HL sensitivity and can cause frustration and stress among HCP. Conclusion: Targeted interventions and organizational support are essential to address HCP's obstacles with HL sensitivity. Utilizing improved communication techniques and HL tools may help reduce stress and frustration. Practice Implications: To optimize HL sensitivity, it is imperative to prioritize HCP needs. Organizations should strive to facilitate HL in a way that does not impose additional stress on HCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.