ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Machine learning-based identification of high-risk bone metastasis factors after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical applications of MRI-based artificial intelligence in spinal metastases: A systematic review.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Addressing Current Limitations Through Emerging Technologies.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone metastasis is a serious complication following radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients, significantly affecting their long-term survival. This study aims to develop a clinical predictive model utilizing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and advanced machine learning algorithms to identify key factors that increase the risk of bone metastasis (BM). Patients and methods: The study analyzed a cohort of 1161 prostate cancer patients, including 38 who developed bone metastasis. Preoperative T2-weighted images (T2WI) were obtained, and tumor lesions were manually delineated to extract relevant features from the imaging data. Spearman correlation analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, and logistic regression were used to select and construct the model. Four machine learning algorithms-extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)-were employed to predict BM occurrence, integrating these with clinical information. Results: Among the four prognostic models evaluated, the XGBoost algorithm performed the best. In the training dataset, the XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.926 (0.870-0.982), an accuracy of 0.847 (0.773-0.921), a sensitivity of 0.880 (0.835-0.926), and a specificity of 0.829 (0.755-0.904). In the validation dataset, the XGBoost model attained an AUC of 0.706 (0.586-0.826), an accuracy of 0.687 (0.661-0.713), a sensitivity of 0.693 (0.557-0.829), and a specificity of 0.664 (0.505-0.822). The external validation dataset yielded an AUC of 0.91, demonstrating the robust predictive capabilities of the XGBoost model. Conclusion: The predictive model for bone metastasis in prostate cancer, developed using the XGBoost machine learning algorithm, shows high accuracy and significant clinical relevance. This model provides a valuable tool for identifying high-risk patients, potentially informing better management and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.