ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Leveraging automated time-lapse microscopy coupled with deep learning to automate colony forming assay.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Physicochemical Characterization and Biological Effects of Magnetite- and Maghemite-Based Magnetic Colloidal Suspensions in A704 Renal Cancer Cells.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative evaluation of YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and RT-DETR for automated microcarrier colonization assessment in bioreactor cell cultures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Quality Monitoring and Control in Stem Cell Cultures: A Comprehensive Review.Biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- AI in optimized cancer treatment: laying the groundwork for interdisciplinary progress.Oxford open immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The colony forming assay (CFA) stands as a cornerstone technique for evaluating the clonal expansion ability of single cancer cells and is crucial for assessing drug efficacy. However, traditional CFAs rely on labor-intensive, endpoint manual counting, offering limited insights into the dynamic effects of treatment. To overcome these limitations, we developed an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted automated CFA combining time-lapse microscopy for real-time tracking of colony formation. Methods: Using B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) cells from an E2A-PBX1 mouse model, we cultured them in a collagen-based 3D matrix with cytokines under static conditions in a low volume (60 µl) culture vessel and validated its comparability to methylcellulose-based media. No significant differences in final colony count or plating efficiency were observed. Our automated platform utilizes a deep learning and multi-object tracking approach for colony counting. Brightfield images were used to train a YOLOv8 object detection network, achieving a mAP50 score of 86% for identifying single cells, clusters, and colonies, and 97% accuracy for Z-stack colony identification with a multi-object tracking algorithm. The detection model accurately identified the majority of objects in the dataset. Results: This AI-assisted CFA was successfully applied for density optimization, enabling the determination of seeding densities that maximize plating efficiency (PE), and for IC50 determination, offering an efficient, less labor-intensive method for testing drug concentrations. In conclusion, our novel AI-assisted automated colony counting platform enables automated, high-throughput analysis of colony dynamics, significantly reducing labor and increasing accuracy. Furthermore, it allows detailed, long-term studies of cell-cell interactions and treatment responses using live-cell imaging and AI-assisted cell tracking. Discussion: Future integration with a perfusion-based drug screening system promises to enhance personalized cancer therapy by optimizing broad drug screening approaches and enabling real-time evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.