Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046566›Full record

ReviewPsychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2023

Psychedelic Commercialization: A Wide-Spanning Overview of the Emerging Psychedelic Industry.

Jacob S Aday, Brian S Barnett, Dan Grossman, Kevin S Murnane, Charles D Nichols, Peter S Hendricks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Trials, trips, and tribulations: pathways for implementing psychedelic therapy in Ireland.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. We need to talk about shrooms.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob S AdayDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-8530
Brian S BarnettDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-5701
Dan GrossmanDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Kevin S MurnaneDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology & Neuroscience, and Louisiana Addiction Research Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
Charles D NicholsDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Peter S HendricksDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the wake of positive clinical trial outcomes of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy for the treatment of various psychiatric disorders, there has been an influx of financial investment into psychedelic drug development from the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors. Psychedelics are now a multibillion dollar industry, with hundreds of companies that are seeking to commercialize therapeutic applications of psychedelics formed over the course of just a few years. Materials and Methods: This paper aims to provide a broad overview of the psychedelic industry by detailing the history and current state of psychedelic drug commercialization, exploring challenges to commercial viability, highlighting ethical considerations, and incorporating lessons from the analogous ketamine and cannabis industries, which largely preceded the psychedelic industry. Results: We found that although the roots of the psychedelic industry go back decades, financial investment did not take off in earnest until the late 2010s and early 2020s. The main focus of companies in the psychedelic sector can be broadly grouped into: (1) drug discovery and development; (2) novel formulations and routes of administration; (3) manufacturing and synthesis; (4) treatment centers and wellness clinics; (5) consumer packaged goods and adult use; and (6) adjunct technologies. Challenges to commercial viability include regulatory barriers to drug development, treatment costs and logistics of administration, and intellectual property and patent issues. In terms of ethics, the industry must consider the potential adverse effects of psychedelics, cost-cutting inclinations, ensuring therapeutic benefits reach vulnerable and marginalized communities, and indigenous reciprocity. We also underscore the potential benefits commercialization may bring. Lastly, the ketamine and cannabis industries can provide blueprints for regulatory approval, clinical implementation, insurance reimbursement, and federal policy more broadly. Conclusion: Altogether, this article provides a wide-spanning overview of the emerging commercialization of psychedelics, acknowledging both the monumental progress and critical challenges that remain for the industry.

Indexed as

commercializationethicshistoryindustrypsychedelicsreview

Identifiers

PMID40046566
PMCPMC11661494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.