ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization by Gender and Migraine Frequency in Adult Patients Receiving Galcanezumab Versus Standard of Care Preventive Medications Over 24 months: A United States Retrospective Claims Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe 24-month treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and direct costs of patients initiating galcanezumab (GMB) versus standard of care migraine preventive medications (SOC), stratified by gender and migraine type. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Optum's Results: Following stratification and matching, the GMB and SOC cohorts included the following patient pairs: 2015-female, 292-male, 1024-CM, and 1282-EM. Treatment adherence, measured by proportion of days covered, and median time to treatment discontinuation were significantly greater in those initiating GMB compared with SOC in females, males, patients with CM, and patients with EM (all Conclusion: While direct costs over 24 months were higher in patients initiating GMB for migraine prevention, better adherence and longer treatment duration with GMB regardless of gender or migraine type support the use of GMB compared with SOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.