Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046557›Full record

ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2025

Improvement in positional accuracy of neural-network predicted hydration sites of proteins by incorporating atomic details of water-protein interactions and site-searching algorithm.

Kochi Sato, Masayoshi Nakasako

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kochi SatoDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan.
Masayoshi NakasakoDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visualization of hydration structures over the entire protein surface is necessary to understand why the aqueous environment is essential for protein folding and functions. However, it is still difficult for experiments. Recently, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict the probability distribution of hydration water molecules over protein surfaces and in protein cavities. The deep network was optimized using solely the distribution patterns of protein atoms surrounding each hydration water molecule in high-resolution X-ray crystal structures and successfully provided probability distributions of hydration water molecules. Despite the effectiveness of the probability distribution, the positional differences of the predicted positions obtained from the local maxima as predicted sites remained inadequate in reproducing the hydration sites in the crystal structure models. In this work, we modified the deep network by subdividing atomic classes based on the electronic properties of atoms composing amino acids. In addition, the exclusion volumes of each protein atom and hydration water molecule were taken to predict the hydration sites from the probability distribution. These information on chemical properties of atoms leads to an improvement in positional prediction accuracy. We selected the best CNN from 47 CNNs constructed by systematically varying the number of channels and layers of neural networks. Here, we report the improvements in prediction accuracy by the reorganized CNN together with the details in the architecture, training data, and peak search algorithm.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learninghydrophobic hydrationprotein hydrationX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID40046557
PMCPMC11876803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.