Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046527›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Inter-prefectural and urban-rural regional disparities in rectal cancer and rectal resections: A Japanese nationwide population-based cohort study from 2014 to 2019.

Masamitsu Kido, Tomohiro Arita, Katsutoshi Shoda, Hiroki Shimizu, Jun Kiuchi, Kenji Nanishi, Luying Yan, Eigo Otsuji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Masamitsu KidoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Inage Hospital Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6883-1228
Tomohiro AritaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7127-6504
Katsutoshi ShodaFirst Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine University of Yamanashi Chuo Yamanashi Japan.
Hiroki ShimizuDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4642-5488
Jun KiuchiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Kenji NanishiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Luying YanDepartment of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Eigo OtsujiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This observational study aimed to elucidate the regional disparities in rectal cancer (RC) and rectal resections (RRs) across Japan. Methods: The annual incidence of RC, and number of all RRs and board-certified surgeons by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery were examined by prefecture in Japan from 2014 to 2019. The surgical approaches were broken down by open and laparoscopic. Disparities in 47 prefectures and urban-rural disparities were evaluated using the Gini coefficient and unpaired Results: The annual national average incidence of RC was 50 127 and the number of all RRs was 39 903. Gini coefficients for RC, and laparoscopic and all RRs were <0.2, indicating low inequality. There was no significant difference between urban and rural prefectures in the number of RRs, despite a significantly higher incidence of RC in rural prefectures and a significantly higher number of board-certified surgeons in urban prefectures ( Conclusion: RC and laparoscopic and all RRs exhibited minimal inter-prefectural disparities. The urban-rural analysis revealed significant differences in the incidence/number of RC and board-certified surgeons between urban and rural prefectures, despite minor differences in RRs regardless of approach. This pattern suggests a potential migration of surgical services from rural to urban areas. This preliminary study is expected to contribute to a basic epidemiological database for RC and RRs.

Indexed as

databaseepidemiologyrectal cancerrectal resectionsurgeon

Identifiers

PMID40046527
PMCPMC11877343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.