ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioceramic versus conventional endodontic sealers: An umbrella review.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Review
- Fabrication and characterization of a bioactive glass and tricalcium silicate incorporated resin-based root canal sealer.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Sealing Ability of Polydopamine-Coated Gutta-Percha With Bioceramic Sealer: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of apical micro leakage in root canals obturated with different bio ceramic sealers.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Microleakage of zinc oxide eugenol, resin, calcium hydroxide, bioceramic and bioactive glass sealers using stereomicroscope: AnBioinformation · 2026Article
- Coronal microleakage of two intraorifice bioceramic barriers in single-rooted premolars:Dental research journal · 2026Article
- Functional and Bioactive Performance of Premixed Bioceramic Sealers with Warm Obturation: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A comparative analysis of adhesion abilities between AH PlusJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Influence of irrigating solutions on the hydration of calcium silicate-based dental biomaterials: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of bioactive calcium silicate coating on functionalized gutta-percha and its effect on bioceramic sealer wettability - AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Could the sealer thickness affect the filling ability of bioceramic endodontic materials? Evaluation in a simulated physiological condition.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of pushout bond strength of three different sealers: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Access cavity in endodontics: Balancing precision, preservation, and clinical needs.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers, i.e., BioRoot RCS, CeraSeal, and Bio-C sealer, using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF). Methodology: Eighty-eight extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with mature apices and straight root canals were selected. Teeth were decoronated at 12 mm length from the apex. They were divided into 4 groups according to the sealer used ( Results: After 48 h, the control group showed the least microleakage, and the difference was statistically significant compared to all experimental groups. After immersion in SBF for 30 days, no significant difference in microleakage was seen among all the groups. Conclusion: The sealing ability of the bioceramic sealers with single-cone obturation when exposed to the SBF improved significantly after 30 days and was comparable to AH Plus using the WVC obturation technique. Thus, single-cone obturation with bioceramic sealers can be considered a viable alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.