ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Evaluation of one- versus two-step technique on the outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulp sensibility assessment following permanent tooth pulpotomy: a scoping review of clinical studies.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Outcome of full pulpotomy versus partial radicular pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis using Biodentine - A randomized controlled trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: This study compares one-step and two-step mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy techniques in treating symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) in mature molars over 12 months. Aims: To compare the clinical efficacy of one-step versus two-step MTA pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with SIP. Setting and Design: This clinical trial involved 30 patients with SIP in mandibular molars, comparing one-step and two-step MTA pulpotomy. Methodology: Thirty patients (aged 15-35) with SIP in mandibular molars were randomly assigned to two groups: one-step MTA pulpotomy ( Statistical Analysis: The results were analyzed statistically using the independent t-test, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson's Chi-square test. Results: Both groups showed significant pain reduction ( Conclusion: Both one-step and two-step MTA pulpotomy techniques showed high success rates in treating SIP in mature molars, with no significant difference. The one-step method is an effective alternative to the two-step approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.