ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Comparative evaluation of sealing potential of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and bio-C repair in furcation perforations: A glucose penetration study.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Root Perforations: Etiology, Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors, and Contemporary Repair Materials: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- A comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of NeoPutty, Biodentine, and Bio-c repair using a radioactive isotope method - AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on microhardness and solubility of mineral trioxide aggregate and bioceramic putty.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Sealing ability of nano-bioactive glass, Bio-C repair, and EndoSequence Bioceramic-root Repair Material putty as root end restoratives: A confocal laser microscopic study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Outcome of an Extensive Mid-Root Perforation With Unintentional Bioceramic Extrusion: A Case Report With 2-Year Recall Using CBCT.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Repair of critical bone defects with two bioceramics in rat calvaria.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Single-step integrated minimally invasive static-guided microsurgery for file retrieval from the periapex of mandibular molar.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Repair of furcal perforations using different calcium silicate cements: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Influence of irrigants on "bond strength" of "Bio-C Repair and TheraCal LC" in "perforation repair:" AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Furcation perforation is a common dental issue that can result in substantial tooth loss if not repaired with a material that effectively seals the area. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine have been previously studied for their sealing capabilities, but Bio-C Repair is a relatively new material that is yet to be evaluated. This study sought to compare and evaluate the sealing potential of MTA, Biodentine, and Bio-C Repair as furcation perforation repair materials using the glucose penetration method. Materials and Methods: Forty-five mandibular molars were sectioned 3 mm above the cementoenamel junction. Access openings were prepared, and intentional perforations were created in the pulpal floor using a round bur. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 15. Group 1 was repaired with MTA, Group 2 with Biodentine, and Group 3 with Bio-C Repair. The sealing potential was evaluated using a glucose penetration test. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's Results: The test results demonstrated that glucose penetration was significantly least in Group 3 (1.5313), followed by Group 1 (8.2208) and highest in Group 2 (8.5622) at Conclusions: Within the study's limitations, Bio-C Repair exhibited the best sealing ability for furcation perforations, followed by MTA and then Biodentine. Therefore, Bio-C Repair could be a suitable alternative to MTA and Biodentine for repairing furcal perforations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.