ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Hybrid barn: the switch from a naturally to a mechanically ventilated turkey barn to protect from harmful bioaerosols.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Animal health is essential to ensure the highest level of animal welfare and to conserve resources. Especially in naturally ventilated barns, the airborne entry of pathogens is difficult to avoid. For instance, birds in naturally ventilated turkey barns are frequently infected by highly pathogenic avian influenza and the airborne route may play a role. In this study, a naturally ventilated turkey barn was equipped with filter modules that allow a conversion to a mechanically ventilated barn. Methods: Four filter modules with two filter stages were adapted to a turkey barn and the curtains were closed to induce a slight overpressure in the barn. Air samples were taken over the course of 16 months in front of and behind the filter units to assess the filter efficiencies. Filter efficiencies were evaluated by the reduction of particle classes (PM1, PM10, nanoparticles), microorganisms (total bacteria, molds, yeasts), and the detection of potentially pathogenic bacteria and viruses by PCR tests. Results: Particle reduction rates were 94.17% for PM1, 94.27% for PM10, and 95.80% for nanoparticles, respectively. Total bacteria counts were reduced by 95.88%, molds by 94.64%, and yeasts by 66.03%. Discussion: The flexible switch from a naturally to a mechanically ventilated barn with filtered supply air can be an innovative solution to avoid airborne pathogen entry in risky situations and may represent a component in the strategy to control epidemic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.