ArticleCureus2025
Senile Scleral Plaque Mimicking an Intraocular Foreign Body.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plucking the plaque: Is it necessary?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Senile scleral plaques are localized, calcified deposits typically occurring bilaterally in elderly patients and are often asymptomatic. They usually appear near the insertion of the rectus muscles and are associated with age-related changes in the sclera. In rare cases, a senile scleral plaque can occur unilaterally and may mimic the appearance of an intraocular foreign body (IOFB) especially in a post-traumatic case. We report a case of a unilateral senile scleral plaque. A 65-year-old gentleman presented with left eye pain and blurring of vision while hammering a nail into the wall at home. On examination, his visual acuity was 6/24 in the right eye and 6/60 in the left eye. On his left eye, there was a conjunctival laceration at eight o'clock. His left anterior chamber was shallow with the presence of cells 3+. His left pupil was irregular with an area of sphincter tear at eight o'clock. His left lens was posteriorly dislocated. Computed tomography (CT) of the orbit revealed a hyperdense opacity temporally, which was suspicious of an intraocular foreign body. He underwent examination under anesthesia with phacofragmentation and pars plana vitrectomy for his posteriorly dislocated crystalline lens. Intraoperatively, there was the presence of a senile scleral plaque at the temporal region, with no evidence of an intraocular foreign body. He underwent a scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation later on, and postoperatively, his visual acuity for his left eye was 6/6. He remains well with good vision throughout his follow-up. Although less common, the unilateral presentation of senile scleral plaques should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hyperdense orbital lesions in elderly patients. The potential for senile scleral plaques to mimic intraocular foreign bodies underscores the importance of thorough clinical evaluation and the careful interpretation of imaging studies in patients presenting with ocular trauma. A thorough clinical evaluation, coupled with a cautious interpretation of radiologic findings, is essential in guiding appropriate management and ensuring optimal visual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.