Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046380›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Decoding Hypotension: Porcelain Aorta and Its Unexpected Normalcy.

Raya Tcheroyan, Jachrise Sibblis, Jesse Liou, Thomas Sewatsky

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raya TcheroyanInternal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA.
Jachrise SibblisHospital Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA.
Jesse LiouPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA.
Thomas SewatskyCritical Care Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral blood pressure (PBP) is used as a substitute for central blood pressure (CBP) because it is more accessible and less invasive, but in certain conditions like porcelain aorta, it may fail to accurately represent true hemodynamics. Porcelain aorta, characterized by extensive calcification of the aortic arch, can lead to significant discrepancies between PBP and CBP leading to challenges in diagnoses and management. We report a case of an 80-year-old male individual with porcelain aorta, found to have a greater than 100 mmHg difference in systolic PBP and CBP, who presented with recurrent admissions for hypotension despite an absence of organ dysfunction. This case highlights the need to be aware and account for CBP measurements in patients with extensive vascular calcifications to guide appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.

Indexed as

blood pressure readingcritical caregeneral internal medicineporcelain aortashock

Identifiers

PMID40046380
PMCPMC11881664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.