ArticleCureus2025
Assessing Emergency Medicine, Family Medicine, and ICU Doctors' Knowledge, Confidence, and Attitude in Managing In-Flight Medical Emergencies in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In-Flight Medical Events on Commercial Airline Flights.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn-flight medical emergencies (IFMEs) present unique challenges for healthcare professionals, requiring a specific set of knowledge and skills that are not typically covered in standard medical training. This study aims to assess the knowledge, practices, and confidence levels of healthcare professionals in managing IFMEs, as well as their understanding of aviation physiology. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 5,000 healthcare professionals from various specialties and regions. Participants completed a comprehensive survey assessing their demographic characteristics, clinical knowledge, aviation physiology knowledge, and attitudes toward IFMEs. Data were analyzed to identify knowledge gaps, regional and specialty-based variations, and factors influencing confidence levels in handling in-flight emergencies.
resultsThe study revealed that 3745 (74.9%) of the participants demonstrated adequate knowledge, with significant variations observed across regions and specialties. Intensive care unit (ICU) specialists and participants from the Middle region showed the highest levels of knowledge. However, gaps were identified in critical areas such as advanced airway management, cardiac arrest recognition, and understanding of aviation physiology, particularly cabin pressurization and decompression sickness. Additionally, 2125 (42.5%) of the participants expressed the need for further training in managing in-flight emergencies, citing concerns about unfamiliarity with specific emergencies and medicolegal implications.
conclusionWhile overall knowledge levels were relatively high, the study highlights significant gaps in critical areas of in-flight emergency management. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions and training programs focused on the unique challenges of the aviation environment. Addressing these gaps will enhance the preparedness and confidence of healthcare professionals, ultimately improving patient outcomes during air travel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.