Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046291›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2025

Effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for people living with long covid (Listen trial): pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

Monica Busse, Philip Pallmann, Muhammad Riaz, Claire Potter, Fiona J Leggat, Shaun Harris, Andrea Jane Longman, Rachel Lowe, Adrian Edwards, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena and 5 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Cost-Effectiveness of a Personalised Self-Management Intervention for People Living With Long Covid: The LISTEN Randomised Controlled Trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Challenges of Inclusion: A Population-Based Interview Study of Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Internet interventions · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Monica BusseCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-5909
Philip PallmannCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8274-9696
Muhammad RiazCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5512-1745
Claire PotterCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Fiona J LeggatPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6754-7225
Shaun HarrisSwansea Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Andrea Jane LongmanCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-8219-6226
Rachel LoweCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7306-0085
Adrian EdwardsPrimary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Aloysius Niroshan SiriwardenaCommunity and Health Research Unit, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-8201
Nick SevdalisCentre for Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions, National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-8924
Jackie McRaePopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6835-7589
Jessica FishSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9337-1489
Bernadette SewellSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-922X
Fiona JonesPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-3895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Listen, a self-management support intervention, for people living with long covid who were not in hospital. Design: Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Setting: Twenty four sites in England and Wales. Participants: Identified from long covid clinic waiting lists, word of mouth, and adverts/social media self-referred to the trial, 554 adults with long covid were randomised to receive either the Listen trial intervention or NHS usual care. Interventions: The Listen intervention involved up to six one-to-one personalised sessions with trained healthcare practitioners and an accompanying handbook co-designed by people with lived experience and health professionals. Usual NHS care was variable, ranging from no access, access to mobile applications and resources, and to specialist long covid clinics. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Oxford participation and activities questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) routine activities scale score at three months assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included Ox-PAQ emotional wellbeing and social engagement scale scores, the Short Form-12 (SF-12) health survey, the fatigue impact scale, and the generalised self-efficacy scale at three months. The EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) assessed health utility. Serious adverse events were recorded. Results: Between 27 May 2022 and 15 September 2023, 554 people with long covid (mean age 50 (standard deviation 12.3) years; 394 (72.4%) women) were randomly assigned. At three months, participants assigned to the intervention group reported small non-significant improvements in the primary outcome of capacity for daily activities as assessed by Ox-PAQ routine activities scale score (adjusted mean difference -2.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.38 to 0.02), P=0.052) compared with usual NHS care. For the secondary outcomes, people receiving the intervention also reported significant improvements in mental health (Ox-PAQ emotional wellbeing -5.29 (95% CI -8.37 to -2.20), P=0.001; SF-12 2.36 (95% CI 0.77 to 3.96), P=0.004), reductions in fatigue (fatigue impact score -7.93 (95% CI -11.97 to -3.88), P<0.001), and increases in self-efficacy (generalised self-efficacy scale 2.63 (95% CI 1.50 to 3.75), P<0.001). No differences were found in social engagement (-2.07 (95% CI -5.36 to 1.22), P=0.218) or SF-12 physical health (0.32 (95% CI -0.93 to 1.57), P=0.612). No intervention related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The personalised self-management support intervention of the Listen trial resulted in non-significant short term improvements in routine activities when compared with usual care. Improvements in emotional wellbeing, fatigue, quality of life, and self-efficacy for people living with long covid were also reported. Physical health and social engagement were not affected by the trial intervention. The limited understanding of how much change is clinically meaningful in this population along with the unblinded design, the use of self-referral as a recruitment method and variable usual care may have introduced unintended bias and thus limits robust conclusions about this intervention. Further research is required to fully establish the impact of the intervention. Trial registration number: ISRCTN36407216, ISRCTN registry, registered 27 January 2022.

Indexed as

Clinical trialCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID40046291
PMCPMC11881025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.