Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046240›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025

Kellgren-Lawrence grading of knee osteoarthritis using deep learning: Diagnostic performance with external dataset and comparison with four readers.

Elias Vaattovaara, Egor Panfilov, Aleksei Tiulpin, Tuukka Niinimäki, Jaakko Niinimäki, Simo Saarakkala, Mika T Nevalainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Studying the Natural History of the Knee Joint.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elias VaattovaaraResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Egor PanfilovResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Aleksei TiulpinResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Tuukka NiinimäkiDepartment of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Jaakko NiinimäkiResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Simo SaarakkalaResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mika T NevalainenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in an external dataset to assess radiographic knee osteoarthritis using Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades against versatile human readers. Materials and methods: Two-hundred-eight knee anteroposterior conventional radiographs (CRs) were included in this retrospective study. Four readers (three radiologists, one orthopedic surgeon) assessed the KL grades and consensus grade was derived as the mean of these. The DL model was trained using all the CRs from Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and validated on Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset and then tested on our external dataset. To assess the agreement between the graders, Cohen's quadratic kappa (k) with 95 ​% confidence intervals were used. Diagnostic performance was measured using confusion matrices and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Results: The multiclass (KL grades from 0 to 4) diagnostic performance of the DL model was multifaceted: sensitivities were between 0.372 and 1.000, specificities 0.691-0.974, PPVs 0.227-0.879, NPVs 0.622-1.000, and AUCs 0.786-0.983. The overall balanced accuracy was 0.693, AUC 0.886, and kappa 0.820. If only dichotomous KL grading (i.e. KL0-1 vs. KL2-4) was utilized, superior metrics were seen with an overall balanced accuracy of 0.902 and AUC of 0.967. A substantial agreement between each reader and DL model was found: the inter-rater agreement was 0.737 [0.685-0.790] for the radiology resident, 0.761 [0.707-0.816] for the musculoskeletal radiology fellow, 0.802 [0.761-0.843] for the senior musculoskeletal radiologist, and 0.818 [0.775-0.860] for the orthopedic surgeon. Conclusion: In an external dataset, our DL model can grade knee osteoarthritis with diagnostic accuracy comparable to highly experienced human readers.

Indexed as

Deep learningKellgren-LawrenceOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID40046240
PMCPMC11876873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.