ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2025
Beyond the Sound: The Role of the Source of Human-Made Trigger Sounds in Misophonia.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Misophonia is a neuropsychiatric disorder characterised by abnormally extreme reactions to certain sensory stimuli. In this paper, we aimed to investigate the effect of the individual producing the human-generated trigger sound on the level of discomfort reported to the trigger sound. Our hypothesis was that when the misophonic sound is presented with the information that it is produced by a relative, it will create more subjective discomfort than the sound presented with the information that is not produced by a relative. Methods: This experimental study was conducted with 15 participants aged 18-65 years living in Antalya who volunteered to participate in the study. Results: In the first comparison, participants reported more subjective discomfort when the voice from the sound bank was presented with the information that it was produced by the relative than when the relative's voice was presented with the information that it was not produced by the relative (p<0.001). In the second comparison, participants reported more subjective discomfort when the voice of the relative was presented with the information that it was produced by the relative than when the voice of the relative was presented with the information that it was not produced by the relative (p=0.001). In the final comparison, there was no significant difference in subjective discomfort between presenting the voice of the voice bank with the information that it was produced by the relative and presenting the voice of the relative with the information that it was produced by the relative (p=0.783). Conclusion: In conclusion, it seems source of the trigger, especially for human-made sounds, is more important than the trigger sound itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.