ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Web-based machine learning application for interpretable prediction of prolonged length of stay after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a retrospective cohort study with explainable AI.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Digital Transformation of Rehabilitation Medicine: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Innovations, Clinical Integration, and Future Paradigms.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- Article
- A machine learning model for automated anesthesia risk classification in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: development and multicenter validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is an increasingly important issue related to back pain in elderly patients, resulting in significant socioeconomic burdens. Postoperative complications and socioeconomic effects are evaluated using the clinical parameter of hospital length of stay (LOS). This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based tool that can calculate the risk of prolonged length of stay (PLOS) after surgery and interpret the results. Methods: Patients were registered from the spine surgery department in our hospital. Hospital stays greater than or equal to the 75th percentile for LOS was considered extended PLOS after spine surgery. We screened the variables using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and permutation importance value and selected nine features. We then performed hyperparameter selection via grid search with nested cross-validation. Receiver operating characteristics curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis was carried out to assess model performance. The result of the final selected model was interpreted using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were used for model interpretation. To facilitate model utilization, a web application was deployed. Results: A total of 540 patients were involved, and several features were finally selected. The final optimal random forest (RF) model achieved an area under the curve (ROC) of 0.93 on the training set and 0.83 on the test set. Based on both SHAP and LIME analyses, intraoperative blood loss emerged as the most significant contributor to the outcome. Conclusion: Machine learning in association with SHAP and LIME can provide a clear explanation of personalized risk prediction, and spine surgeons can gain a perceptual grasp of the impact of important model components. Utilization and future clinical research of our RF model are made simple and accessible through the web application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.