Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046131›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Modern health worries and exposure perceptions of individuals reporting varying levels of sensitivity to electromagnetic fields: results of two successive surveys.

Maryse Ledent, Benjamin Vatovez, Philippe Roelandt, Jimmy Bordarie, Maël Dieudonné, Els De Waegeneer, Caroline Kremer, Laura Boucher, Catherine Bouland, Eva Maria De Clercq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maryse LedentChemical and Physical Health Risks, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Benjamin VatovezCellule Champs Électromagnétiques, Institut Scientifique de Service Public (ISSeP), Liège, Belgium.
Philippe RoelandtCellule Champs Électromagnétiques, Institut Scientifique de Service Public (ISSeP), Liège, Belgium.
Jimmy BordarieQualipsy (UR1901), University of Tours, Tours, France.
Maël DieudonnéCentre Max Weber, Institut des Sciences de l'Homme, Lyon, France.
Els De WaegeneerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Caroline KremerÉcole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Laura BoucherÉcole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Catherine BoulandÉcole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Eva Maria De ClercqChemical and Physical Health Risks, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals who claim to be affected by idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) report symptoms linked to EMF exposure. Uncertainties about the causes of these symptoms often leave them seeking their own care solutions. In our connected societies, they may limit their exposure, leading to a spiral of avoidance that negatively impacts overall health. Our objective is to gain insights into the characteristics of people who report sensitivity to EMFs in an attempt to provide care guidance. This study focuses on modern health worries (MHW), behaviours, and exposure perceptions of people reporting various sensitivity levels to EMFs during the COVID-19 lockdowns, which altered habits and increased telecommunication device use. Methods: We conducted two surveys during relaxed lockdown periods in Belgium (June/July 2020 and February/March 2021). A total of 97 and 285 participants, respectively, answered a questionnaire on sensitivity to EMFs, MHW, exposure perception, and strategies to limit EMF exposure. We applied nonparametric descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses. Results: Higher sensitivity to EMFs correlates with greater MHW regarding EMF sources and more strategies to limit EMF exposure. However, these strategies were inconclusive, as many still felt highly exposed to EMFs. Discussion: Given the high distress, social isolation, and professional difficulties faced by some EMF sensitive individuals, the relevance of exposure avoidance strategies is questionable. People who perceive high sensitivity to EMFs report worries and avoidance behaviors, yet still feel highly exposed. The findings suggest exploring new care avenues.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electromagnetic FieldsEnvironmental ExposureAdultAgedBelgiumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSurveys and Questionnairesavoidance strategiesexposure perceptionidiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF)modern health worries (MHW)sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID40046131
PMCPMC11879838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.