ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Switching from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy in the treatment of infective endocarditis: a case series and literature review of real-world data.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Partial Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Infective Endocarditis: A Practical Review of Current Evidence and Guidelines.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Oral Gepotidacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea: Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing Outcomes in a Randomized, Multicenter Phase 3 Trial (EAGLE-1).Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Should We Extend the Use of Oral Antibiotics in Infective Endocarditis? The ENDO-ORAL Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Oral Therapy for Infective Endocarditis: Where Do We Stand?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The POET trial, along with other studies, indicated that switching from IV to partial oral treatment (POT) in selected infective endocarditis (IE) cases is as effective as the traditional 4-6 weeks of IV therapy. This evidence supported the inclusion of POT in the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, although real-world data remain limited. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed IE patients at ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo in Milan, Italy, from January 2018 to July 2022, to identify those who switched to POT. Additionally, a literature review was conducted using PubMed to gather real-world data up to October 2024. Results: Among 136 IE patients treated at our institution, 9 switched from IV antibiotic therapy to POT. The switch was driven by factors such as lack of venous access, patient preference or improved adherence, and IV antibiotic toxicity. All patients who underwent POT recovered, with no in-hospital or 1 month post-discharge deaths. The literature review uncovered 8 observational studies, 3 case series and 10 case reports, which overall support the effectiveness and safety of POT in selected IE cases, while also highlighting benefits like reduced hospital stays, lower treatment costs and fewer IV-related complications. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, stepping down to POT after an initial IV regimen proved effective and safe in clinically stable IE patients. This approach offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays, enhanced quality of life and cost savings. Further data are needed to validate these findings and expand the use of oral regimens in broader clinical contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.