Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046068›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025

Switching from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy in the treatment of infective endocarditis: a case series and literature review of real-world data.

Lorenzo Brando Lundgren, Lorenzo Albertini, Anna De Bona, Camilla Tincati, Matteo Augello, Giulia Marchetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Should We Extend the Use of Oral Antibiotics in Infective Endocarditis? The ENDO-ORAL Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorenzo Brando LundgrenClinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9116-3406
Lorenzo AlbertiniClinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8616-8114
Anna De BonaClinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Camilla TincatiClinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-2962
Matteo AugelloClinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-9504
Giulia MarchettiClinic of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-4828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The POET trial, along with other studies, indicated that switching from IV to partial oral treatment (POT) in selected infective endocarditis (IE) cases is as effective as the traditional 4-6 weeks of IV therapy. This evidence supported the inclusion of POT in the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, although real-world data remain limited. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed IE patients at ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo in Milan, Italy, from January 2018 to July 2022, to identify those who switched to POT. Additionally, a literature review was conducted using PubMed to gather real-world data up to October 2024. Results: Among 136 IE patients treated at our institution, 9 switched from IV antibiotic therapy to POT. The switch was driven by factors such as lack of venous access, patient preference or improved adherence, and IV antibiotic toxicity. All patients who underwent POT recovered, with no in-hospital or 1 month post-discharge deaths. The literature review uncovered 8 observational studies, 3 case series and 10 case reports, which overall support the effectiveness and safety of POT in selected IE cases, while also highlighting benefits like reduced hospital stays, lower treatment costs and fewer IV-related complications. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, stepping down to POT after an initial IV regimen proved effective and safe in clinically stable IE patients. This approach offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays, enhanced quality of life and cost savings. Further data are needed to validate these findings and expand the use of oral regimens in broader clinical contexts.

Identifiers

PMID40046068
PMCPMC11879544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.