ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
National expert consensus on the management of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients with a penicillin allergy label based on the Delphi method.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with a penicillin allergy label have an increased risk of surgical site infection. Although a decision tree was published in 2019 to define which patients could benefit from direct cephalosporin use in the perioperative setting, this strategy remains unvalidated. This consensus statement aimed to adapt it based on an expert consensus to cover persisting caveats and to adapt it to an environment with poor allergist resources. Methods: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and allergy experts were invited to participate. The Delphi method was implemented using an online-secured network. The panellists were given 3 weeks to answer each round. A consensus was reached if more than 75% of the experts rated the item ≥ 7 and if less than 25% rated the item ≤ 3. Results: Sixteen experts participated. A high level of agreement was obtained after four rounds, defining four categories of the index reaction: unknown, not compatible, or compatible with an immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction. Twelve items were defined to stratify the risk of true penicillin allergy according to the index reaction history. The experts agreed that patients with high-risk reactions could benefit from either an allergy work-up or beta-lactam alternatives use. Those at low risk could benefit from direct cephalosporin administration. Conclusions: This resulted in an adapted decision tree to promote cephalosporin prescription in patients with penicillin allergy labels. It will be used in a stepped-wedge prospective multicentric randomized study to assess its applicability and acceptability to promote first- and second-generation cephalosporin administration in the perioperative period.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.