ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Clinical application of Myxovirus resistance protein A as a diagnostic biomarker to differentiate viral and bacterial respiratory infections in pediatric patients.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating myxovirus resistance protein A-based rapid testing combined with pathogen sequencing for arboviral and incidental viral infection surveillance in Senegal.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Surfactant-free polymer microspheres with molecular confinement-enabled optical encoding for dual-color immunochromatographic assays.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Host-response biomarker MxA for etiological discrimination of pediatric lower respiratory tract infections: implications for diagnostic study design.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Age-Structured Clinical Background Is More Strongly Associated with C-Reactive Protein Levels than Individual Respiratory Viruses During Respiratory Virus Testing.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Flu A/B, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV Antigen Combo Rapid Test in Hospitalized Children Under Two Years of Age.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Limited discriminatory value of C-reactive protein for viral coinfection and respiratory severity in children evaluated in the emergency department for acute respiratory tract illness.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Differentiating between viral and bacterial respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients remains a significant diagnostic challenge, often leading to the overuse of antibiotics. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) has been identified as a promising biomarker for viral infections. This study aimed to assess the fluctuations in blood MxA levels among children with viral respiratory infections and to explore the differences in MxA levels between viral and bacterial infections, focusing on clinical implications for antibiotic use. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure MxA levels in a cohort of 314 children with respiratory tract infections and 89 healthy controls. The study compared MxA levels across children with viral, bacterial, and mixed infections. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to distinguish between viral and bacterial infections or between viral and co-infections, with additional comparisons to other established infection biomarkers. Results: MxA levels were significantly elevated in children with viral infections (n=205) compared to bacterial infections (n=21) (p<0.0001). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that MxA had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8019 (95% CI: 0.6989 to 0.9049) for distinguishing viral from bacterial infections. Combining MxA with C-reactive protein (CRP) further enhanced diagnostic performance, achieving an AUC of 0.8713 (95% CI: 0.7916 to 0.9510). However, the use of MxA or MxA/CRP alone is insufficient to differentiate viral and viral - bacterial coinfection. The AUC of MxA is 0.5161 (95% CI: 0.4392 to 0.5930), and the AUC of MxA/CRP is 0.5429 (95% CI: 0.4705 to 0.6153). Conclusions: This study highlights the diagnostic potential of MxA as a biomarker for differentiating viral from bacterial respiratory infections in children. The combined use of MxA and CRP offers a novel approach to improve diagnostic accuracy. Still, a combination with other clinical and laboratory markers remains required to determine whether to administer antibiotics to children with respiratory tract infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.