ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Impact of Simulation-Based Surgical Training in Laparoscopy on Satisfaction Level and Proficiency in Surgical Skills.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating subjective perceptions and objective video analysis to identify challenges in laparoscopic suturing: a cross-sectional study to enhance surgical training.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- We're talking about practice: examining the shifting role of FLS in surgical education.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The adoption of laparoscopic surgery has significantly transformed surgical practice. However, mastering these techniques requires specialized training. In Saudi Arabia, the level of proficiency in laparoscopic skills among General Surgery (GS) trainees is not well-documented. This study aims to assess GS residents' satisfaction with their laparoscopic training, self-appraise their proficiency, and objectively evaluate their skills using the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) test. Methods: This cross-sectional study, approved by the Institutional Review Board and funded by Alfaisal University, took place between October 2021 and May 2023. It involved a two-part approach: an online survey and objective FLS testing. The survey, distributed to GS residents in seven government hospitals in Riyadh, captured self-reported satisfaction and subjective proficiency data. Subsequently, residents who volunteered for FLS testing were objectively assessed using standardized criteria. Results: Of 195 residents, 70 (36%) responded to the survey. Satisfaction with academic teaching and hands-on training in laparoscopic surgery was low (24% and 44%, respectively), while 62% were satisfied with case volume. Self-assessed proficiency was higher for basic skills than for advanced skills like extra-corporeal and intracorporeal knotting. Only a third had been exposed to laparoscopic trainers, and 14.3% had FLS certification prior. Fourteen residents participated in FLS testing, revealing a 36% failure rate in task completion. Prior simulation practice or laparoscopic training certification significantly improved performance (p<0.001), reflected by achieving higher scores and passing FLS proficiency scores. Conclusion: Despite satisfaction with exposure to laparoscopic surgeries, the study highlights a considerable gap in satisfaction and proficiency among GS residents in Saudi Arabia, particularly in advanced laparoscopic skills. The positive impact of simulation-based practice and laparoscopic training certification underscores the need for structured training programs. Addressing these gaps, through integrating comprehensive simulation-based programs and promoting laparoscopic skill certification, is crucial for enhancing surgical education and training outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.