Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045973›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Opening the window to the children's mind: the superior efficacy of open-ended physical games in the development of attention and socio-emotional skills.

Shanshan Lyu, Weixiao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shanshan LyuSchool of Physical Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Weixiao ZhangBusiness School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The promotional effects of physical exercise on children's attention and social-emotional skills have been widely confirmed. However, the advantages of open physical games in intervention effects still need further exploration. Therefore, this study discusses the intervention effects of open physical games on children's attention and social-emotional skills. Methods: This study adopted a quasi-experimental design. Two administrative classes were divided into the experimental group (15 boys and 16 girls) and the control group (16 boys and 15 girls) using the coin-toss method. The intervention intensity was moderate (60-69% of HRmax), lasting for 12 weeks, with 3 sessions per week, each lasting 40 min. Both groups focused on the teaching of fundamental motor skills (FMS). The experimental group was intervened with open physical games, while the control group was intervened with closed physical games. The Adolescent Attention Test was used to measure attention quality; the Children's Social and Emotional Skills Scale was used to measure social-emotional skills; the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition was used to measure locomotors and manipulative skills; and the Fundamental Movement Skill Development Test for Children Aged 3 to 10 was used to measure stability skills. Based on SPSS 25.0 and GraphPad Prism 8 software, statistical analysis was conducted using independent samples Results: After the intervention, open physical games had a more positive effect on children's attention distribution ( Conclusion: Open physical games have superior effects on children's attention, social-emotional skills, and FMS compared to closed physical games. This has guiding significance for subsequent physical education practices and the formulation of public health policies.

Indexed as

attentionchildrenclosed exerciseopen exercisephysical gamessocio-emotional skills

Identifiers

PMID40045973
PMCPMC11879968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.